- Research has shown that punishment is “ineffectual over the long term as a technique for eliminating the kind of behavior towrad which it is direct.” (pp. 63-4)
- Punishment has recently been repackaged as “consequences.” (p. 65)
- Warnings about the consequences to follow (punishment–loss of privilege or something else unpleasant) end up being threats that reveal distrust that children want to or will do the right thing if there is no punishment. (p. 65)
- Natural consequences (Example: forgetting lunch means going hungry) can be experienced by the child as the adult in their life refusing to help. (p. 66)
- “The more you rely on punishment, ‘the less real influence you’ll have on their lives.’” (p. 68)
- Why punishment doesn’t work (p. 67-71): makes people mad, models use of power, loses effectiveness, erodes our relationships with our kids, distracts kids from the important issues, makes kids self-centered.
- Children more likely to ask “What do the grown ups with the power want me to do and what will happen to me if I don’t? versus “What kind of person do I want to be?”
- Punishing out of love is confusing to children.
- There is a continuum of conditional parenting(doing to):
- harsh corporeal punishment
- milder spankings
- other punishments
- tangible rewards
- verbal rewards
Goal is to get off the “doing to” continuum entirely and moving towards a “working with.”
QUESTIONS to CONSIDER
- Do you agree that consequences are punishments wrapped up in a new package? Why or why not?
- When have you found yourself along the conditional parenting continuum? As a child? As a parent/caregiver?
- What is a time/situation in which you found a solution other than something along the conditional parenting continuum? What led you to that action/thought/solution instead of something conditional?
- What do you think helps you move towards a working with approach rather than getting stuck in a doing to kind of reaction?